In the second half of 2022, China unveiled the details of its data export regulations, providing further explanations to its existing laws and regulations on data.
While there is no outright ban of cross-border data transfers, restrictions and procedures imposed on cross-border data transfers could create significant barriers for cross-border flow of data for legitimate business operations.
Such restrictions could potentially discourage companies from doing business in or with China, and eventually reduce the country’s trade competitiveness.
Since becoming effective in 2018, the European Union’s (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has been hailed as the gold standard in data protection. Perhaps surprising to many western observers, China’s Personal Information Protection Law borrowed many of the concepts and regulatory framework from GDPR.
However, despite the similarities in certain approaches between GDPR and Chinese data laws and regulations, China’s approach towards cross-border data flows is a significant departure from GDPR’s general principles endorsing free flow of data.
With restrictions on data flows, China faces challenges not only to its seat as the world’s factory, but also its digital economy champion status. Policies around cross-border data flows can tilt the balance in favour of China’s trade competitors such as Vietnam or Singapore.
Data has been playing a more important role in the future of manufacturing. Since 2020, more and more companies have started moving their supply chains beyond China to countries like Vietnam to diversify supply chain risk.
While Vietnam mandates the storage of data locally, transferring data outside Vietnam is not subject to requirements as strict as China. Vietnam endorses GDPR’s “adequacy of the level of protection” principle.
Reference:
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/11/china-data-export-regulations-threaten-trade-competitiveness/
Disruptions in the Red Sea, Suez Canal, and Panama Canal have driven up shipping costs, sending shockwaves through the global economy.
It was truly heartwarming to see so many clients and associates visiting our stand, even as late as at the end of the show, sharing drinks and engaging in conversations.
Ocean freight rates on key global container routes have fallen again. Despite the upcoming Golden Week in China, which usually drives demand, the situation this year is slightly different, and the expected rate increase may not happen.
Highly potent active pharmaceutical ingredients (HPAPIs) are at the dangers of cross-contamination with other product forefront of pharmaceutical manufacturing. They are particularly common in targeted therapies and personalized medicines. This is primarily due to their potent therapeutic effects at low dosage forms.
The floating traffic jams off ports. The multiplying costs of moving freight. The resulting shortages of goods. All of this had seemed like an unpleasant memory confined to the COVID-19 pandemic. But no such luck!
An ocean container capacity crunch has hit global trade just as peak shipping season starts, with freight spot rates up some 30% over the past few weeks and heading higher.
The first joint Europe-wide assessment of the drivers and impact of chemical pollution by the European Environment Agency (EEA) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has concluded that, despite progress in some areas, “more work is still needed to reduce the impact of harmful substances on human health and the environment”. Key findings include:
The severe drought which has forced the Panama Canal, one of the world’s busiest trade passages, to limit daily crossings could impact global supply chains during a period of high demand.
In the early hours of March 26, the Singapore-flagged ship Dali, loaded with 5,000 containers, slammed into Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge, causing the 1.6-mile (2.5-kilometer) bridge to collapse in a matter of seconds. The Dali was departing for Colombo when the disaster struck. Initial fears were confirmed that half a dozen people lost their lives in the accident.